Radar sensors and ultrasonic sensors are both widely used for level measurement in various industries, but they have distinct advantages and limitations. This comprehensive guide delves into the technical details, quantifiable data points, and specific use cases to help you make an informed decision between these two sensor technologies.
Measurement Principle
Radar sensors use electromagnetic waves that travel at the speed of light, approximately 3 x 10^8 m/s. These waves are reflected off the target surface, and the sensor measures the time-of-flight to determine the distance. In contrast, ultrasonic sensors use sound waves that travel at the speed of sound, which is around 343 m/s at 20°C. The difference in wave propagation speed can impact the reliability and accuracy of the measurement, especially in applications with rapidly changing conditions.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Wave Type | Electromagnetic | Sound |
| Wave Speed | 3 x 10^8 m/s | 343 m/s at 20°C |
| Measurement Principle | Time-of-flight | Time-of-flight |
Medium Requirement
Radar sensors do not require a medium for signal transmission, making them suitable for use in vacuum or when other gases are present. This allows them to be used in a wide range of applications, including those with challenging process conditions.
Ultrasonic sensors, on the other hand, require a medium (usually air) for sound wave transmission. The performance of ultrasonic sensors can be affected by changes in temperature, pressure, density, and gas composition, which can alter the speed of sound and impact the accuracy of the measurement.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Medium Requirement | No medium required | Requires air or other medium |
| Affected by Process Conditions | Less affected | More affected by temperature, pressure, density, gas composition |
Beam Angle
The latest radar sensors using a higher 80 GHz frequency have a very narrow beam angle, as small as 3.6°. This narrow beam allows them to avoid internal obstructions and minimize unwanted reflections, improving the reliability and accuracy of the measurement.
Ultrasonic sensors, on the other hand, have a wider beam angle, which can make them more susceptible to interference from internal obstructions and unwanted reflections. This can be a challenge in applications with complex tank geometries or the presence of internal structures.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Beam Angle | Narrow, as small as 3.6° | Wider beam angle |
| Interference from Obstructions | Less affected | More susceptible to interference |
Frequency Range
Ultrasonic sensors operate using frequencies ranging between 30 kHz and 240 kHz, with lower frequencies used for measuring longer distances and higher frequencies used for measuring smaller distances. The choice of frequency depends on the specific application requirements.
Radar sensors, on the other hand, use radio microwaves, which are unaffected by process conditions such as temperature, pressure, or gas composition. This makes radar sensors more reliable and accurate in a wider range of applications.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency Range | Radio microwaves | 30 kHz to 240 kHz |
| Affected by Process Conditions | Less affected | More affected by temperature, pressure, gas composition |
Mounting Location
Ultrasonic sensors require precise mounting location to avoid interference from floors, pipes, walls, and other nearby objects. Improper mounting can lead to measurement errors and reduced reliability.
Radar sensors, on the other hand, are less sensitive to mounting location, making them easier to install and maintain. This flexibility can be particularly beneficial in applications with complex tank geometries or limited access.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Mounting Location Sensitivity | Less sensitive | More sensitive, requires precise mounting |
| Ease of Installation and Maintenance | Easier | More challenging |
Price
Traditionally, radar sensors were more expensive than ultrasonic sensors. However, the introduction of new, compact, and cost-effective radar devices, such as the Rosemount™ 1208 Level and Flow Transmitter, has made radar sensors more price-competitive.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Historical Price | More expensive | Less expensive |
| Current Price Trend | Becoming more cost-competitive | Relatively stable |
Performance in Changing Conditions
Radar sensors are less affected by changing temperatures, foam, product reflectivity, dust, condensation, buildup, and noise than ultrasonic sensors. This makes radar sensors more reliable and accurate in changing or difficult environments, such as those found in the chemical, oil and gas, and power industries.
Ultrasonic sensors, on the other hand, can be more susceptible to these environmental factors, which can lead to measurement errors and reduced reliability.
| Characteristic | Radar Sensor | Ultrasonic Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerance to Temperature Changes | Higher | Lower |
| Tolerance to Foam, Dust, Condensation | Higher | Lower |
| Tolerance to Product Reflectivity Changes | Higher | Lower |
| Tolerance to Noise | Higher | Lower |
Conclusion
In summary, radar sensors offer several advantages over ultrasonic sensors, including their ability to operate in vacuum or when other gases are present, their narrow beam angle, their immunity to noise and changing conditions, and their ease of installation and maintenance. However, ultrasonic sensors remain a cost-effective, non-contact means of level measurement and are well-suited for simple level measurements in processes with little to no changing conditions.
The choice between radar and ultrasonic sensors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your application, such as the process conditions, tank geometry, and budget constraints. By understanding the technical details and quantifiable data points presented in this guide, you can make an informed decision that best meets the needs of your industrial process.
References
- Endress+Hauser, “Radar vs. ultrasonic level sensors – Endress+Hauser”, https://endressprocessautomation.com/radar-vs-ultrasonic-sensors-fit-for-purpose-technology/
- VEGA, “80 GHz radar vs. ultrasonic: Non-contact Level Measurement”, https://www.vega.com/en-us/company/blog/2019/80-ghz-radar-vs-ultrasonic
- Emerson Automation Experts, “4 reasons why radar level is superior to ultrasonic level technology”, https://www.emersonautomationexperts.com/2023/measurement-instrumentation/4-reasons-why-radar-level-is-superior-to-ultrasonic-level-technology/
- Heating and Process, “What is the difference between Radar and Ultrasonic?”, https://www.heatingandprocess.com/radar-vs-ultrasonic/
- APG Sensors, “Ultrasonic Vs. Radar Level Sensors | Blog”, https://www.apgsensors.com/about-us/blog/ultrasonic-vs-radar-level-sensors-blog/
The lambdageeks.com Core SME Team is a group of experienced subject matter experts from diverse scientific and technical fields including Physics, Chemistry, Technology,Electronics & Electrical Engineering, Automotive, Mechanical Engineering. Our team collaborates to create high-quality, well-researched articles on a wide range of science and technology topics for the lambdageeks.com website.
All Our Senior SME are having more than 7 Years of experience in the respective fields . They are either Working Industry Professionals or assocaited With different Universities. Refer Our Authors Page to get to know About our Core SMEs.