The Ocular Lens: A Comprehensive Guide for Physics Students

The ocular lens, also known as the crystalline lens, is a crucial component of the eye that plays a vital role in focusing light onto the retina, enabling clear and sharp vision. This comprehensive guide delves into the intricate details of the ocular lens, providing physics students with a deep understanding of its measurable and quantifiable properties.

Lens Diameter (LD)

The lens diameter (LD) is a critical parameter that can influence the positioning and alignment of intraocular lenses (IOLs) during cataract surgery. Studies have shown that LD is positively correlated with axial length (AL) and age, but it cannot be predicted by white-to-white (WTW) distance.

  • The average LD is approximately 9-10 mm in adults, with a range of 8-11 mm [1].
  • LD increases with age, from around 6 mm at birth to 10 mm in adulthood [2].
  • The relationship between LD and AL can be expressed by the equation: LD = 0.55 × AL + 4.1 mm [3].
  • The average blind spot, where the optic nerve leaves the eye, is 7.5° in diameter, vertically centered 1.5° below the horizontal meridian [4].

Lens Thickness

ocular lens

The lens thickness varies with age and can influence the refractive power of the eye. In a study of 122 eyes, the average lens thickness was:

  • 4.44 ± 0.37 mm in emmetropic eyes
  • 4.55 ± 0.41 mm in myopic eyes
  • 4.70 ± 0.43 mm in hyperopic eyes [5]

The lens thickness increases with age due to the gradual accumulation of lens fibers, which can contribute to the development of presbyopia and cataracts.

Refractive Index

The refractive index of the human lens is approximately 1.41, but it increases with age due to the gradual accumulation of high-refractive-index proteins. This change in the refractive index can contribute to the development of presbyopia and cataracts.

  • The refractive index of the lens can be described by the Gullstrand-Emsley formula: n = 1.406 + 0.0006(age – 25) [6].
  • The refractive index of the lens core (nucleus) is higher than the refractive index of the lens cortex, creating a gradient refractive index (GRIN) structure [7].
  • The GRIN structure of the lens helps to minimize spherical aberration and improve the overall optical performance of the eye [8].

Lens Power

The lens power is another essential parameter that changes with age. In a study of 110 eyes, the average lens power was:

  • 20.55 D at 20 years
  • 23.73 D at 40 years
  • 30.27 D at 60 years [9]

The increase in lens power with age is due to the gradual increase in lens thickness and refractive index, which can contribute to the development of presbyopia.

Accommodation

The lens accommodates to focus on objects at different distances. The amplitude of accommodation decreases with age, from approximately 15 D at birth to around 2 D in elderly individuals.

  • The accommodative response can be described by the Duane-Fincham equation: A = 15.5 – 0.27 × age [10].
  • The mechanism of accommodation involves the contraction of the ciliary muscle, which changes the curvature of the lens and its refractive power [11].
  • The decrease in accommodative amplitude with age is a primary cause of presbyopia, the inability to focus on near objects.

Chromatic Aberration

The lens can cause chromatic aberration due to its dispersion properties. The longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) of the human lens is approximately:

  • 0.4 D for blue light (486 nm)
  • 0.1 D for red light (656 nm) [12]

Chromatic aberration can lead to color fringes around objects and can be partially compensated by the cornea and other optical components of the eye.

Spatial Frequency

The lens’s modulation transfer function (MTF) can be described by its spatial frequency response. The MTF of the human lens decreases with age, leading to a reduction in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

  • The MTF of the lens can be modeled using the Strehl ratio, which is a measure of the lens’s ability to focus light [13].
  • The Strehl ratio of the lens decreases from around 0.8 in young eyes to 0.4 in elderly eyes, indicating a significant reduction in optical quality [14].
  • The decrease in MTF with age is primarily due to the gradual accumulation of lens fibers and the development of cataracts.

In conclusion, this comprehensive guide provides physics students with a deep understanding of the measurable and quantifiable properties of the ocular lens. By exploring the lens diameter, thickness, refractive index, power, accommodation, chromatic aberration, and spatial frequency, students can gain a thorough appreciation of the complex optical system of the eye and its role in vision.

References:

  1. Olsen, T. (1986). Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmologica, 64(3), 282-286.
  2. Atchison, D. A. (1995). Accommodation and presbyopia. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 15(4), 255-272.
  3. Olsen, T. (1992). The correlation between corneal thickness and the size of the anterior chamber. Acta Ophthalmologica, 70(3), 282-286.
  4. Mariotti, L., & Defranceschi, A. (1982). The blind spot: a new method for its objective measurement. Ophthalmologica, 185(1), 36-42.
  5. Atchison, D. A., Markwell, E. L., Kasthurirangan, S., Pope, J. M., Smith, G., & Swann, P. G. (2008). Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. JOSA A, 25(4), 2033-2044.
  6. Gullstrand, A. (1909). Appendix II. In Helmholtz’s Treatise on Physiological Optics (Vol. 1, pp. 350-358). Optical Society of America.
  7. Pierscionek, B. K. (1993). Refractive index contours in the human lens. Experimental eye research, 57(6), 783-790.
  8. Sharma, R., Yadav, A. K., & Katti, C. P. (2019). Gradient refractive index lens design: a review. Applied optics, 58(1), A1-A11.
  9. Koretz, J. F., Kaufman, P. L., Neider, M. W., & Goeckner, P. A. (1989). Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye–aging of the anterior segment. Vision research, 29(12), 1685-1692.
  10. Duane, A. (1912). Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. JAMA, 59(12), 1010-1013.
  11. Glasser, A., & Kaufman, P. L. (1999). The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology, 106(5), 863-872.
  12. Thibos, L. N., Ye, M., Zhang, X., & Bradley, A. (1992). The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans. Applied optics, 31(19), 3594-3600.
  13. Thibos, L. N., Hong, X., Bradley, A., & Cheng, X. (2002). Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. JOSA A, 19(12), 2329-2348.
  14. Artal, P., Berrio, E., Guirao, A., & Piers, P. (2002). Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. JOSA A, 19(1), 137-143.